| Genre | Reviewers Male / Female | Recommend Yes / No | Number of Reviews | Quality of Singles | Accuracy of Profiles | Features, Service, Ease-of-Use | Overall Experience | Total Average Rating |
| MatchMaking | 9 / 14 | 2 / 21 | 23 | 2.32 | 3.14 | 3.61 | 1.75 | 2.70 |
| Date Submitted: | May 31, 2009 |
| Site Name: | eHarmony |
| Quality of Singles: | 1 out of 10 |
| Accuracy of Profiles: | 10 out of 10 |
| Features, Service, Ease-of-Use: | 1 out of 10 |
| Overall Experience: | 1 out of 10 |
| Recommend: | No |
| Review: | Too Expensive, Confusing, Overwhelming A former girlfriend of mine married a guy through E Harmony. He's a control freak and she's biding her time (for her son to finish HS) until she divorces the guy. Even the most complex system isn't perfect. My experience: it took forever to answer their questions and then they kicked me out of the system! Said they couldn't do anything for me. One word: NUTS! Comments [ 0 ] |
| Submitted by: | MrIntuition 53 year-old :: Male Reviewer :: UT |
| Date Submitted: | May 7, 2009 |
| Site Name: | eHarmony |
| Quality of Singles: | 5 out of 10 |
| Accuracy of Profiles: | 8 out of 10 |
| Features, Service, Ease-of-Use: | 10 out of 10 |
| Overall Experience: | 6 out of 10 |
| Recommend: | Yes |
| Review: | Happily Married - thanks to eHarmony I was on eHarmony for less than 2 days when matched with the man I eventually married (10 months later). Of course, he was on eHarmony for 1.5 years before that. Yes, there are a lot of dead profiles, which is really, really dumb. Honestly, that's why only a 6/10 from me. Otherwise it was a great experience. I met 3 of the men who I was matched with. I liked all three A LOT, but you can only have one husband. I think I got lots more matches than, say, my husband did, because I was a lot more open. I have a more outgoing personality. Is eHarmony for everyone? Certainly not, but it worked for me. I liked the matching service (29 dimensions test); it delivered highly compatible matches. Comments [ 0 ] |
| Submitted by: | Stephanie J 22 year-old :: Female Reviewer :: Salt Lake City, Utah |
| Date Submitted: | February 5, 2009 |
| Site Name: | eHarmony |
| Quality of Singles: | 1 out of 10 |
| Accuracy of Profiles: | 1 out of 10 |
| Features, Service, Ease-of-Use: | 7 out of 10 |
| Overall Experience: | 1 out of 10 |
| Recommend: | No |
| Review: | More like e:Smarmony - Married Singles????!!!!! I am one of the stupid ones who bought into the commercials about finding your lifes partner on e:Harm...but only succeeded in finding married men who had failed at every other smarmy site in my area - so while they invested relatively little to spin a tale - I paid a lot for that privilege. I don't know what the 29 dimensions of compatability are, but one should definitely include sincerity to find a long term relationship. I'd invested for a year and have sadly, met men of low calibre who are looking to defraud women such as myself. Thankfully I'm not stupid enough to fall for ALL the b.s...but would NEVER recommend this site to anyone I cared about EVER. Comments [ 0 ] |
| Submitted by: | Snowed by e:harmony in Canada 44 year-old :: Female Reviewer :: Calgary, Alberta |
| Date Submitted: | January 3, 2009 |
| Site Name: | eHarmony |
| Quality of Singles: | 3 out of 10 |
| Accuracy of Profiles: | 3 out of 10 |
| Features, Service, Ease-of-Use: | 1 out of 10 |
| Overall Experience: | 1 out of 10 |
| Recommend: | No |
| Review: | fake spent 2 hours filling out the profile, and told i don't have a match. that is impossible. false advertising. how can they stay in buisness. Comments [ 0 ] |
| Submitted by: | rss0412 46 year-old :: Male Reviewer :: il. |
| Date Submitted: | December 20, 2008 |
| Site Name: | eHarmony |
| Quality of Singles: | 1 out of 10 |
| Accuracy of Profiles: | 1 out of 10 |
| Features, Service, Ease-of-Use: | 2 out of 10 |
| Overall Experience: | 1 out of 10 |
| Recommend: | No |
| Review: | Major, major ripoff I joined E Harmony for the second time because there was a three month promotional discount going on, and I figured, why not. Well, the majority of the men I was matched with did not have active subscriptions, many had no pictures up even though I could have sworn I asked to be matched with people with pictures. I also asked that my age range of matches be between 34 and 40 (I am 39) and for a two week period they must have sent me like 10 matches that were between the ages of 48 and 50! When I emailed them asking them why this was so, they pointed out that I had indicated that the age of my matches was "not important." I fixed it, so that was okay. I did get rejected by a lot of people with the description of "other" which could mean anything-and some people would just ignore the set of questions that require you to answer in a paragraph form. Never again would I subscribe to this site-even if it were free. At my age it is hard to meet people who are single and looking to settle down, but I think I am going to go with speed dating-I have a much better chance of hitting it off with someone in person. Comments [ 0 ] |
| Submitted by: | Michele 39 year-old :: Female Reviewer :: Hamden, CT |