| Genre | Reviewers Male / Female | Recommend Yes / No | Number of Reviews | Quality of Singles | Accuracy of Profiles | Features, Service, Ease-of-Use | Overall Experience | Total Average Rating |
| MatchMaking | 10 / 15 | 2 / 23 | 25 | 2.45 | 3.49 | 3.40 | 1.85 | 2.80 |
| Date Submitted: | July 10, 2008 |
| Site Name: | eHarmony |
| Quality of Singles: | 1 out of 10 |
| Accuracy of Profiles: | 1 out of 10 |
| Features, Service, Ease-of-Use: | 1 out of 10 |
| Overall Experience: | 1 out of 10 |
| Recommend: | No |
| Review: | What a Rip Off Every time I called Eharmony to complain, they just extended my membership another few months. What a rip off!! I sent my first set of "Intro Questions" to over 125 men - with ONLY TWO responding. I'm a better than average looking physical therapist and, now, I really doubt that Eharmony's website even works. I SERIOUSLY DOUBT THAT THIS WEBSITE WORKS. I've gotten droves of replies from my Match.com profile. SAVE YOUR MONEY - STAY THE HECK AWAY FROM EHARMONY!!!!! Comments [ 0 ] |
| Submitted by: | Ohiokaren 49 year-old :: Female Reviewer :: Ohio |
| Date Submitted: | June 22, 2008 |
| Site Name: | eHarmony |
| Quality of Singles: | 3 out of 10 |
| Accuracy of Profiles: | 2 out of 10 |
| Features, Service, Ease-of-Use: | 1 out of 10 |
| Overall Experience: | 2 out of 10 |
| Recommend: | No |
| Review: | Bait? The customer service was very lame. Further, a customer satisfaction survey was so poorly written that it made me wonder if there was only one Oz behind the curtain and he/she was flying solo as THE eharmony employee. A question to customer service typically netted a canned responses full of assurances. I was matched often to men booted out of the eharmony club. The information given was slim, so I knew little about the matches. MOST IMPORTANT, I started to suspect that the whole game was to get a user to keep renewing by any means possible. Matching me to those with expired memberships? Probably matching men with me, after my membership had expired. Both of us getting emails about a match "contacting" the other? I also wondered if they got real busy finding matches as the membership was about to expire. I suspected that they did lots of baiting to generate renewed interest and more money. Comments [ 0 ] |
| Submitted by: | sharon 55 year-old :: Female Reviewer :: the south |
| Date Submitted: | April 15, 2008 |
| Site Name: | eHarmony |
| Quality of Singles: | 1 out of 10 |
| Accuracy of Profiles: | 1 out of 10 |
| Features, Service, Ease-of-Use: | 1 out of 10 |
| Overall Experience: | 1 out of 10 |
| Recommend: | No |
| Review: | eHarmony is not worth the bandwidth I signed up and I was matched with women I would never consider if I met them in person first. You can't set your search- the 6 "Phd's" do that for you. I never post reviews but I made an exception for eharmony. They should be embarrassed to charge more than 5 dollars/ month for what they offer. Try a site that suits your lifestyle that is the most promising. Never join eharmony. Comments [ 0 ] |
| Submitted by: | Jim 30 year-old :: Male Reviewer :: Northeast |
| Date Submitted: | February 16, 2008 |
| Site Name: | eHarmony |
| Quality of Singles: | 5 out of 10 |
| Accuracy of Profiles: | 5 out of 10 |
| Features, Service, Ease-of-Use: | 2 out of 10 |
| Overall Experience: | 2 out of 10 |
| Recommend: | No |
| Review: | OK for long distance relationships I took the time to complete the questions, upload the pics and plunk down more money than the rest of the sites in hopes that this would be the place. NOT! I don't want a long distance relationship and every one of my matches wasn't even in my area code. One was over 300 miles away. No, I don't live in Alaska, but in NJ. The matches were further away in the beginning, then got closer as time went on. Why didn't I get the closer ones first? Then they send you 6 hits a day, so many that you can't possibly keep up. But when you look closely, most don't meet what you were looking for. Although most seemed like decent ladies of course there were the pompous ones with glamour shots who thought Mr. GQ was gonna be there. No different than any of the other sites I guess. I'm done with the online dating. I get more dates in the grocery store than I do on the computer. I really can't see how this site says it's so sucessful, cause I know others who were disappointed with it too. Match.com is better. At least there you can make the choices about who to contact. Comments [ 0 ] |
| Submitted by: | RW 48 year-old :: Male Reviewer :: New Jersey |
| Date Submitted: | October 11, 2007 |
| Site Name: | eHarmony |
| Quality of Singles: | 1 out of 10 |
| Accuracy of Profiles: | 5 out of 10 |
| Features, Service, Ease-of-Use: | 2 out of 10 |
| Overall Experience: | 1 out of 10 |
| Recommend: | No |
| Review: | Better for men than women I'll admit that my profile was very accurate as to who I am. But I quickly found out that women my age hardly get any matches at all. The guys, OTOH, told me they were so swamped with matches that they couldn't possibly respond to many. A frustrating feature is that most likely most of your matches have probably never actually paid to join the site and thus can't even respond to you. When you don't get any "real" matches, you're stuck as there's nothing you can do to change the criteria. IF, after reading all these reviews you still want to give it a try, then first take the profile and wait. They will send you a deal of joining 3 months for the price of one. I'm glad that's all the time and money I wasted. Comments [ 0 ] |
| Submitted by: | Sojourner 62 year-old :: Female Reviewer :: Midwest |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Related Sites & Information |
|